Posts
New updates!
Manifestos I & II: Click Here
First update: Currently working on setting up: http://femitheistcentral.webs.com/ (Which will soon be registered and renamed FethezHub.org) - Currently have 21 members. Sign up! And, if you would like to be a contributor to the sites perspectives corner (for whatever Femitheist or RadFem related content you want to write and post, email me at: AskFemitheist@ymail.com).
Second update: I am currently working on a new video, the second video for my: "We Can't Be Cool - A Message to Mainstream Feminists" series. I will be expanding on some of the ideas and the general message from video one. Stay tuned for that!
Third update: Working on a second manifesto, which will be entitled: "The Bloodless Revolution: Ending Man" - This manifesto will essentially be supplementary to the first manifesto. It will focus primarily on the elimination of the "nuclear family", along with discussing various methods and devices which we must employ in order to pacify, and "end" what we like to call "MAN". Very important for all members and followers to read. Not sure when it'll be out as I've only just started gathering ideas for it/drafting it. Stay on the lookout for that.
Fourth update: Interview didn't go quite as planned, as the call got dropped shortly after it began (around 6 minutes in) and we weren't able to reconnect. If there is enough in the podcast that I download to be worth uploading to my channel on YouTube, I will upload it. If not, I won't. I would also like to thank the interviewers for allowing me to come on their show.
And, that's all for now!
Thank you for reading.
-Femitheist
.
.
.
NEWEST VIDEO:
____________________________
Follow on Twitter: Click Here
Like on Facebook: Click Here
Subscribe on YouTube: Click Here
Donate: Click Here
Personally, I think that the elimination of the nuclear family will led to increased male violence. That should be obvious to everyone. Kids raised by single moms usually turn out worse than those raised by two parents. Boys will more likely join a gang, become a criminal, etc. Of course, maybe that is all part of the plan. Make things worse until most men are unemployed criminals and then implement a draconian solution to get rid of them (which everyone will want to support since things will be so bad).
ReplyDeleteYou can thank Lyndon B. Johnson for setting the destruction of the "nuclear family" into motion. (Not Feminists, as some like to claim).
Delete«You can thank Lyndon B. Johnson for setting the destruction of the "nuclear family" into motion. (Not Feminists, as some like to claim).»
ReplyDeletenuclear family have been destroyed by no 'fault-divorse', mother custody of child, child alimony (divorse invitation), etc. All those stupidity have been ordered by Femini$t. So YES the evil hate movement know as femini$t have the whole responsability for breaking the nuclear family. NOBODY ELSE than the Evil femini$t.
You don't know much about history, do you?
DeleteLyndon B. Johnson is almost entirely to blame for the deterioration of the nuclear family. During his time in office, he received reports that stated that the "nuclear family" was one of the strongest forces in America, and so, for reasons unknown, he stripped about 90% of the welfare benefits away from families that fit the model. A.K.A One father, one mother, 2.5 children.
This lead to people no longer getting married, with mothers living in the home, or with their own mothers as single mothers, caring for children, and the father living somewhere else, working. THIS began to occur so people could receive the maximum support benefits, because a married family that fit the model lost most of theirs.
The beginning and the deterioration have very little to do with Feminism, as Lyndon B. Johnson and his decisions did, IN FACT, HISTORICALLY, lead to the deterioration of the nuclear family.
All of the things you mentioned are an offset of that, unrelated entirely to Feminism.
Learn some history, kid.
That is only true in the US. The deterioration of the nuclear family in other white Anglophonic countries (UK, Canada, Auz) is entirely due to feminists, as that individual stated.
ReplyDeleteSpecific citation needed.
DeleteAlso, that's not "as that individual stated". He made a blanket statement with zero references to specific locations. I disproved his theory about one location (The United States).
DeleteAll he did was mention "nuclear family have been destroyed by no 'fault-divorse', mother custody of child, child alimony (divorse invitation)" - Most of these are patriarchal constructs anyway, but of course you wouldn't recognize how Patriarchy is harmful to both women AND men.
They're all simple to explain, though, if I really have to explain them to you.
America isn’t the world, though; so that person’s blanket statement was mostly correct. LBJ may have gotten the ball rolling, but it was after he left office when the feminists really started going to town with their activism during the 70’s. The same can’t be said for Canada, Europe or Australia. They’re also experiencing divorce/family law issues getting way out of hand. Those countries’ feminist movements evolved independently from the American brand of feminism. Besides; LBJ has been dead for forty years, so he really can’t be blamed for what feminists are currently doing in Sweden or Denmark. (Notice how feminism is a phenomenon that is almost exclusive to white countries.)
DeleteOf course I wouldn’t recognise that, because Patriarchy Theory is a crock of shit. And what makes you think I’m a man? More and more women like myself are turning anti-feminist. Just do a YouTube search of “women against feminism” or “I am a woman against feminism”, and you’ll find a goldmine. It’s a sick ideology that needs to go away already. The American woman is the most privileged person to ever live in the history of the world. They’re the only women on Earth who literally don’t have to work, if they really didn’t want to.
I never said America was the world.
DeleteHis blanket statement basically just missed the mark. And, without LBJ, that continuous effect would have been far less possible, unless someone else in office did the same thing that he did.
Feminism is a "phenomenon" more exclusive to white countries because "non-white" countries, for whatever reason, have a tendency to value women far less - they're generally falling in a continuous cycle.
And, I'm not talking about "Patriarchy Theory" specifically, I'm just talking about patriarchal constructs. All of the things you listed were brought about by societal interpretations of the role of women. Women receive children more because they are stereotyped as the "child carer", women receive alimony and child support because, historically, women had far less opportunities. These things have persisted due to the patriarchal constructs of the past, and they are harmful to women and men.
Undo that perception of women, and the balance will be corrected.
Also, I am not a Feminist.
"The American woman is the most privileged person to ever live in the history of the world. They’re the only women on Earth who literally don’t have to work, if they really didn’t want to."
I care primarily about Third World Issues and global violence. I'm not really concerned with the West. In fact, the video I'll be doing tomorrow will discuss that.
I don't really care if you're a woman against Feminism, lol. It doesn't make any difference to me whether you're a woman or a man or whether you're a Feminist or Anti-Feminist. I am not a huge fan of Mainstream Feminists in the West either. But, as I said, I'll be discussing that in the video that I do, which will hopefully be up tomorrow.
Have a nice night/day!
Oh, and one more thing. Those "non-white" countries with all of that missing Feminism tend to be far more violent, and most of the "happiest" countries on the planet, studies have shown, tend to have fairly strong Feminist influences.
DeleteLook it up.
It doesn’t matter what fun little prefix you want to give feminism; mainstream, radical, sex-positive or whatever. It’s all still feminism. It’s like Christians who debate over the differences of their various splinter groups, but it doesn’t matter because it’s all still Christianity. They still believe in the same core tenets. As do all the various forms of feminism. You are a feminist for the simple reason that you adhere to and agree with many of their views; Patriarchy Theory being the main one. If feminism did not already exist, nor would your current beliefs. You’ve basically picked and chosen what parts of pre-existing feminism you agree with.
DeleteFeminism has taken a hold of white countries, because straight white men have allowed their women to emasculate them. Just walk into any American university classroom, and you’ll quickly notice that the straight white male has become a laughing stock. White men need to grow a backbone and put an end to that feminism nonsense in their countries.
Some of the core ideologies might be the same, but the desired outcomes differ greatly. And, that IS a very major difference.
DeleteMy beliefs stem from history and statistics, not Feminism. Feminism happened to come later for more than the ideas. I also live in the Southern portion of North America, where the "Feminist" influence is much lower.
I've read Feminist literature, but that was post-beliefs, not pre. I don't particularly care what Feminists of the past believed or had to say. I do AND believe what I wish.
I wasn't discussing Patriarchy Theory with her, I was telling her where those laws CAME from. Patriarchy Theory just happens to somewhat coincide, but they really just stem from generic societal gender roles, and they HAVE persisted. Everywhere they exist.
I'm not a Feminist if I say I'm not a Feminist, just like someone who believes in "God" isn't a Christian if they say they're not a Christian.
Most of the happiest and least violent countries on the planet are heavily Feminist. That is an absolute FACT. So, despite how much you hate "Feminism", it ain't goin' anywhere.
Also, white men haven't become a laughing stock, they've just become less important due to liberalism, not necessarily Feminism.
If your beliefs do not stem from feminism, then why do they line up so nicely with pre-established feminist dogma? For someone who doesn’t care what they had to say, you sure do love regurgitating their signature rantings. The idea of male depopulation is uniquely feminist. Mary Daly was spouting that crap at Boston University 30 and 40 years ago—long before you were even a thought. (You even use the same ten-percent figure that she did.) Nothing you’ve ever said is original. You’re simply parroting and rehashing cooky, oldhat feminist notions. A bit like YouTube creationists who keep arguing the same tired and debunked non-theories. Patriarchy Theory and Male Privilege are about as valid as Intelligent Design. You may not call yourself a feminist, but you are one in thought and deed. You need feminists because you steal their ideas and then repackage them as your own (and assume that nobody notices). Your views are completely dependent upon, and parasitic of feminism.
DeleteIf you’re going to be another dancing circus-monkey on the Internet, then at least bring something new to the table. At least come up with your own shtick. Are your videos a great source of unintentional humour? Absolutely. Is the content original? Hardly.
My beliefs come from my own desires and from observations of trends. The 10% number did, indeed, come from Sally Gearhart, because I think that it's a good number. 1-10%. Everything else I've ever written are my own words. If they happen to coincide with someone else's words, then that's fine.
DeleteI have no idea who Mary Daly is, actually. I got that number from Sally Gearthart. The only Feminist, who wasn't even really a "Feminist", but more of a "Proto-Feminist" that I admire is Virginia Woolf. I like her writings.
Aside from her, I don't care what any of others had to say. Never read anything by Andrea Dworkin, aside from her quotes. In fact, I've only read a few paragraphs of the "SCUM Manifesto", primarily because I find it to be dreadfully tedious as far as reading goes.
Some of my core ideologies are the same, and I've read plenty of conventional Feminist literature for various writing classes, but the desired outcomes that we have, and the desired outcomes that the majority of Mainstream Feminists desire, are entirely different.
Likewise, I oppose Lesbian Separatism, which most "Radical Feminists" are for. I also oppose the destruction of various gender roles, among other things.
I've never said a single word beyond comments about Patriarchy Theory, lol. I discuss the origins of things which can be traced via a historical timeline. You don't need to discuss a theory for that.
I don't call myself a Feminist because I don't want to hinder Feminists or cause them harm. That is the only reason.
As I said, the only thing I ever borrowed from anyone was the "10%" number. Everything else I've written came from my head. If they happen to coincide with things over people have written, then that's because we're on a similar train-of-thought.
But, your assertion that I thought "no one would notice" is baseless and false. I've said numerous times that the 10% number came from Sally Gearhart. Lol.
Everything else, pure coincidence. I wrote International Castration Day after having a dream.
"If you’re going to be another dancing circus-monkey on the Internet, then at least bring something new to the table. At least come up with your own shtick. Are your videos a great source of unintentional humour? Absolutely. Is the content original? Hardly."
I never claimed to be original. No one is original anymore. You can only be unique in this day-and-age, but never original. Every thought and idea has been thought of by someone before at this point, it's just a matter of communicating them. That is what I'm doing.
If you find my content humorous, then that's good, because that's exactly what I want from my dissenters.
But, of course, the content is unique to me, even if all of the ideas aren't original. I sit down, I think for a while, and then I write. I do, say and act as I please, and regardless of what condescending little remarks you make to try to belittle me, I will continue. I gain new friends and supporters every day.
And, that is enough for me.
Have a wonderful night!
What I find most humorous about the dissenters who complain about "originality", is that they only do so when the content conflicts with their ideologies.
DeleteYou're fine with people parroting the "faux-fairness, all people are equal" garbage by the hundreds every day, but if someone comes along with something you disagree with, and they want to express their beliefs and opinions...
"YOU'RE NOT ORIGINAL! JUST PARROTING SHIT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE SAID!" - Of course, that's how you silencers work. Anything to dismiss, deflect, diminish, denigrate and destroy.
I'm not going anywhere, so you're wasting your time. I've put hours, days, weeks and months worth of time and effort into this, for a very slow pay-off, and I intend to continue until this particular phase is complete.
Anyway, night!
LBJ was an anti-American niggerlover who lost the war in Vietnam.
ReplyDeleteHands down the worst president of the 20th century.
Well, I don't know about "nigger-lover". I think he might have used the word "nigger" fairly often, which doesn't necessarily make him racist, but he did do a lot for civil rights.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, the guy was kind of insane and not a great President. Probably also had something to do with the assassination of JFK, but we'll never know. He was a good deal-maker, though.
“Only the unoriginal claim that originality is dead.”
ReplyDelete-Salvador Dali
Surrealist Spanish Artist said it. Must be absolute fact.
DeleteStatement does not make any difference to my position, because I never claimed to be original. Just unique. I am my own individual. A single organism composed of thousands of memories, experiences and thoughts. That is what makes me "original".
The ideologies in and of themselves are unique to me, because they came from my head, but the basic concepts are not necessarily original. They've all been thought of before by someone, even if I've never met that person. There are too many people alive for anyone to have much of an "original" thought anymore. We have existed for too long for that.
A lot of these things are things that I think about every day. I dream about them, think about them when I'm lying in bed at night, think about them while I'm sitting in classes, waiting in line, studying for an exam.
They've all come together, evolved, and they will continue to do so. That is who I am. I am not original, just as no one is. I am merely myself. That is all that I can ever hope to be. That is all that anyone can ever hope to be.
We're all unique, but originality of thought has changed dramatically.
I would argue that the Femitheist is actually extremely original. She's an amazing person, but she's also too humble to admit it. People who hate her are the ones who perpetuate these myths about her and do everything they can do put her down. If they would stop every once in a while and listen, they would learn something. Her collection of thoughts and writings as a whole are unlike anything I've ever seen from any so called 'radical feminists' of the past. She diverges quite often from them. I have a lot of respect for her despite not agreeing with her most extreme solutions. If she left again it would be a great disservice to us all.
Delete'Femitheist', you seem to think that you have dissenters just for the sake of it. That people don't like you "just because". It's because what you're saying is sociopathic and above all; not based on fact. It's based on extreme prejudice, lies and propaganda. There’s also the hypocrisy in our society that people keep pointing out. If someone uploaded a YouTube video saying how they wanted to kill all blacks, it would be removed immediately. But because man-hate is socially acceptable; your absurd videos are allowed to stay up.
ReplyDeleteI can forgive you because you’re only 20. But if you’re still having these outrageous thoughts at 30, then there’s something wrong. Why exactly are you in college if you haven’t risen above this petty supremacist ideology? Are your brother and boyfriend aware of your views? What exactly do they think of them? “Oh yeah; I’m totally with you!”?
That Dali quote above was spot-on. The original go out and prove it; the unoriginal do nothing but emulate others like a squawking parrot. Dali was one of the greatest artists of the twentieth century (and arguably of all time); he was a TRUE original. So coming from him, that quote means something.
Everything I've said is based on statistics, history and scientific research. Not my opinion. My personal opinion is that I wish things were different, because I don't hate men, and it's unfortunate that fate has allotted them such an existence. But, that's just how it is.
Delete"I can forgive you because you’re only 20. But if you’re still having these outrageous thoughts at 30, then there’s something wrong. Why exactly are you in college if you haven’t risen above this petty supremacist ideology? Are your brother and boyfriend aware of your views? What exactly do they think of them? “Oh yeah; I’m totally with you!”?"
Age = dismissive = irrelevant. I'm in college to complete something that I have to complete. Everyone who knows me personally is now aware, and they support me.
"That Dali quote above was spot-on. The original go out and prove it; the unoriginal do nothing but emulate others like a squawking parrot. Dali was one of the greatest artists of the twentieth century (and arguably of all time); he was a TRUE original. So coming from him, that quote means something." - It's an opinion, and an irrelevant one. It's not spot-on to anything currently stated, other than the dissenters trying to misrepresent me. I never said that I was original, I said that I am unique. All of the things I've written came from my head, all of the ideologies may appear individually in other places, but together, as they are, these are all mine. The only thing I've borrowed was "10%", because it's a good number. My friend suggested it as the number. Read up, and you would have known that. But, you're here to try to denigrate me as they all do, and you didn't bother to read or research. You cherry-picked one quote, and then supported it without realizing that it is contextually irrelevant to anything and everything that I am.
I don't want to argue with people who hate me about my state of being. It's just another dismissive tactic by dissenters who want to throw out any disparaging insults they can in short order.
You're the ones parroting. All parroting one another. Floundering around and swinging at air. I will continue to do as I please, and you can continue trying to denigrate, berate and dismiss me. It won't make any difference in the end.
"If you find my content humorous, then that's good, because that's exactly what I want from my dissenters."
ReplyDeleteOooooooooooo!!!
*waves scaredy fingers*